<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wiki Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1352report.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/episode-4-the-wiki-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1352report.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/episode-4-the-wiki-bailout/</link>
	<description>A technology podcast by Sean Burgess, Bruce Elgort, Jess Stratton and Carl Tyler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jess Stratton</title>
		<link>http://1352report.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/episode-4-the-wiki-bailout/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Stratton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1352report.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys!! As an afterthought re: Redbooks, I feel that I should have mentioned that IBM should have gotten SOME kudos  for taking a chance on a new technology instead of playing it safe. As much as we like to make fun of them for having outdated websites, does anyone else think IBM has actually been really good about jumping on board and embracing taking chances on new technologies like wikis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys!! As an afterthought re: Redbooks, I feel that I should have mentioned that IBM should have gotten SOME kudos  for taking a chance on a new technology instead of playing it safe. As much as we like to make fun of them for having outdated websites, does anyone else think IBM has actually been really good about jumping on board and embracing taking chances on new technologies like wikis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://1352report.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/episode-4-the-wiki-bailout/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1352report.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Very good as usual guys, thought it seemed a bit short.  I guess you&#039;re all busy peeps...

Have to say I agree with carl 100% re Redbooks and redwikis, but you knew that anyway.  Would love to know if/when IBM will review the &quot;experiment&quot; and realise they made the wrong decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good as usual guys, thought it seemed a bit short.  I guess you&#8217;re all busy peeps&#8230;</p>
<p>Have to say I agree with carl 100% re Redbooks and redwikis, but you knew that anyway.  Would love to know if/when IBM will review the &#8220;experiment&#8221; and realise they made the wrong decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Osborne</title>
		<link>http://1352report.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/episode-4-the-wiki-bailout/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1352report.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-17</guid>
		<description>A great episode, very enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great episode, very enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
